South Korea’s watchdog names Coupang founder as controlling entity

Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments

The FTC’s decision came after Coupang has faced heightened regulatory attention in South Korea following a data breach in 2025 involving some 34 million customers.

The FTC’s decision came after Coupang has faced heightened regulatory attention in South Korea, following a data breach in 2025 involving some 34 million customers.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Google Preferred Source badge

SEOUL - South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission (FTC) on April 29 designated Mr Kim Bom, the founder of US-listed e-commerce firm Coupang, as the de facto controlling entity of the company, a move that could subject it to more strict regulatory scrutiny.

The FTC’s decision came after Coupang has faced heightened regulatory attention in South Korea following a data breach in 2025 involving some 34 million customers.

Mr Kim Bom, a Korean-American who serves as chief executive officer and chairman of the board at Coupang, will be classified as the group’s “same person”, a South Korean legal term referring to the individual who effectively controls a conglomerate.

Similar designations apply to the heads of major business groups in South Korea including Samsung Electronics chairman Lee Jae-yong, Hyundai Motor group executive chair Euisun Chung and SK Group chairman Chey Tae-won.

The decision follows an FTC investigation into the role of Mr Kim’s brother in the operation of Coupang’s Korea unit, which it decided was sufficient for Mr Kim’s designation based on “substantive information”, the agency said.

“We believe Coupang’s social responsibility will become stronger,” an FTC official told a briefing.

Coupang has expressed its objection to the designation.

Mr Kim could not be reached when the FTC tried to offer him the opportunity to express his view under its procedures, it said.

Coupang rebutted the decision and said in a statement it would file a challenge with a South Korean court, adding that it would “faithfully substantiate these facts through an administrative litigation” seeking cancellation of the designation.

The designation means Coupang would be subject to additional regulations under South Korea’s Fair Trade Act, including disclosure requirements on intra-family transactions and rules governing holding company structures, an FTC official and legal experts said.

“After chairman Kim is designated as the ‘same person,’ Coupang would face additional regulations such as disclosure of related-party transactions and restrictions under holding company rules,” said Mr Kim Sung-jin, an attorney at Seoul-based Keystone & Legal.

“It could also limit the economic activities of Kim’s family members and companies run by relatives may be included as related parties,” the attorney said.

However, questions remain over how effectively the designation can be enforced, given Coupang’s status as a US-listed company on the New York Stock Exchange, experts said.

Separately, the dispute between South Korea and the US centres on a probe involving Coupang, specifically its data breach and the legal scrutiny surrounding chairman Kim.

US officials have reportedly raised concerns about legal protections for the US-listed firm and how the case is being handled in South Korea.

This led to friction, with Washington signalling it could delay security talks unless its concerns were addressed, while Seoul insists the investigation should proceed under domestic law and be kept separate from alliance matters. REUTERS

See more on